In order to give full play to the warning and educational role of typical law enforcement cases, urge and guide all regions to strictly adhere to the bottom line of safety supervision, and strictly investigate and punish illegal acts of safety production in the field of dust explosion according to law, a number of typical law enforcement cases are now published.
Case 12025
On April 1, the law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Bureau of Linyi City, Shandong Province, conducted a law enforcement inspection on a wood industry limited company in Linyi City, and found that the company had committed the following illegal acts: 1. 1. The normal operation and use are not guaranteed, which belongs to the situation determined in Article 14 of the Standard for Determination of Major Accident Hidden Dangers of Industrial and Trade Enterprises; 2. The spray pipe of the spark detection and elimination device installed on the dust removal air duct connected to the sander is disconnected and there is no water, which belongs to the situation determined in Article 14 of the Standard for Determination of Major Accident Hidden Dangers of Industrial and Trade Enterprises; 3. The probe of the air pressure difference monitoring and alarm device at the air inlet and outlet of the bag filter matched with the sander on the east side fell off, which did not guarantee the normal operation. The company was also found to have committed other illegal acts during the inspection. In violation of the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China, the Emergency Management Bureau of Linyi City, in accordance with the provisions of Article 99, paragraph 3, of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China and in combination with the relevant provisions of the Discretionary Benchmark of Administrative Penalties for Emergency Management in Shandong Province, ordered the company to make corrections within a time limit and imposed a total fine of 45 thousand yuan. On April 18,
22025
, the law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Bureau of Xindu District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, inspected a furniture company in Chengdu and found that the company had the following illegal acts: 1. No measures to prevent ignition source such as spark detection and elimination were taken, which belongs to the situation determined in Item 4 of Article 11 of the Standard for Determining Hidden Dangers of Major Accidents in Industrial and Trade Enterprises; one dust collection bin of the central dust collector in No.2.3 woodworking workshop adopts gravity settling chamber for dust removal, which belongs to the situation determined in Item 5 of Article 11 of the Standard for Determining Hidden Dangers of Major Accidents in Industrial and Trade Enterprises. The above-mentioned acts violate the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 1, and Article 41, paragraph 2, of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China. In accordance with the provisions of Article 99 (2) and Article 102 of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China and the relevant provisions of the Administrative Penalty Discretion Benchmark for Safety Production in Sichuan Province, the Emergency Management Bureau of Xindu District ordered the company to make corrections within a time limit and imposed a total fine of 45000 yuan.
Case 32026
From May 18 to 21, the law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Department of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region carried out law enforcement inspection on a carbon company in Baotou City. It was found that the company had committed the following illegal acts: 1. The dry-type dedusting systems installed in the five locations, including the molding workshop and ingredients, did not take any explosion provention and control measures, such as venting, inerting, and explosion suppression, which falls under the circumstances determined in Item 3, Article 11 of the Criteria for Determining Hidden Dangers of Major Accidents in Industrial and Trade Enterprises; 2. The calcination workshop and the bucket elevator explosion hazard area did not set up dust explosion-proof safety warning signs. 3. The dry dust removal system of the feeding system in the calcination workshop is not equipped with 10 safety equipment such as air pressure difference monitoring and alarm device, which does not meet the relevant requirements of national or industrial standards. The company was also found to have committed other illegal acts during the inspection. In violation of the provisions of Article 35 and Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China, the Emergency Management Department of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, in accordance with the provisions of Article 99, paragraphs 1 and 2, of the Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China, and in combination with the relevant provisions of the Benchmark for the Discretionary Power of Administrative Penalties for Emergency Management, imposed a total penalty on the company. Lu Mou, the person in charge of production, was fined 0.5 million yuan.
浙公网安备33010802003254号